Government Mortgage Financial From San francisco v. Countrywide Economic Business

Government Mortgage Financial From San francisco v. Countrywide Economic Business

A135898

chase visa cash advance fee

The newest trial court concluded res judicata prohibited Federal Mortgage Lender away from San Francisco’s (the bank) allege up against Nationwide Financial Enterprise (Countrywide Financial) and you will suffered Nationwide Financial’s demurrer towards basic revised problem in place of hop out to amend.

The financial institution appeals. They contends the newest legal erred of the finishing res judicata prohibited its claim up against Countrywide Economic due to the fact [t]here try no finally judgment into the deserves into the a past action that may features offered rise to res judicata inside action. I differ and you can affirm. I finish the philosophy out of res judicata pubs the fresh Bank’s allege against Countrywide Financial as the: (1) this new Bank’s volunteer dismissal of the claim up against Countrywide Economic when you look at the the earlier action are a final judgment into deserves; and you will (2) the fresh new claim the lending company ignored from inside the a prior https://paydayloancolorado.net/dove-creek/ lawsuit ‘s the exact same reason behind action since allege it claims up against Countrywide Financial in the present suit. With willingly disregarded that have bias says of control people wrongdoing against among several defendants for its very own proper factors, the financial institution might not avoid the res judicata effects of their decision and you can sue the latest ignored offender anew, once more alleging control-people responsibility, inside the dependence on the new pendency ones exact same says resistant to the leftover actors in the 1st action.

We accept given that correct the next allegations on the Bank’s amended criticism with regards to evaluating the transaction sustaining Nationwide Financial’s demurrer:

Courtroom out of Notice, First Section, Department 5, Ca

Into the a method entitled securitization, an organization originate[s] mortgages otherwise acquires those individuals money and you will aggregates her or him toward an excellent equity pool otherwise mortgage pool obtainable to help you a loan company titled a good depositor. step 1 The latest depositor sells the new fund to a trust, which in turn points permits one people-such as the Financial-can purchase. Will eventually ahead of , the lending company purchased 95 residential mortgage-recognized securities of some ties buyers for the 78 securitization trusts backed by domestic mortgages at a price more than $thirteen.5 billion bucks. The lending company purchased permits in the five securitizations of Nationwide Bonds Enterprise (Nationwide Ties). CWALT, Inc. (CWALT) approved the fresh certificates in the five securitizations. Nationwide Bonds frequently awarded this new certificates about fifth securitization. 2

For the , the bank sued seven bonds investors and this provided and marketed the fresh 95 domestic home loan-backed securities, and agencies and therefore issued the new certificates or controlled among the entities you to definitely awarded brand new licenses (Credit Suisse and/or Credit Suisse action). step 3 The core of your Bank’s claims try defendants made not true or misleading comments into the offering documents issued concerning brand new domestic mortgage-recognized securities the bank purchased.

Among the defendants when you look at the Borrowing Suisse had been Countrywide Ties Company, CWALT, and you may Nationwide Monetary. Since related right here, the financial institution so-called: (1) Countrywide Bonds generated not true or mistaken comments regarding the product sales off ties when you look at the ticket of Corporations Code parts 25401 and you will 25501 with esteem to securitizations 74 compliment of 78; cuatro (2) Nationwide Ties and you can CWALT generated false otherwise misleading statements inside violation off sections 11 and twelve of your own Ties Operate of 1933 (parts eleven & 12) in terms of securitizations 75 using 78; and you can (3) Nationwide Economic violated part 15 of your Securities Act (Point fifteen) considering their power over CWALT. With its Part fifteen claim facing Nationwide Financial, the lending company so-called CWALT stayed with no objective rather than found and you may put loans to the trusts. Lower than Point fifteen ? Countrywide ? thus is likely toward Bank as you and you can severally with, and also to a similar the quantity because the, CWALT.

Inside , the lending company filed new grievance about action just before all of us trying erica Organization (declaratory recovery step). The lending company tried a good erica Business-which in fact had bought Countrywide’s assets-try responsible for one injuries Nationwide had to pay from inside the the financing Suisse action.


Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *